Friday, January 3, 2020
Scientific Management - for a Different Time and Place
Scientific Management Introduction Scientific Management was first described by Frederick Taylor in the late 19th century. Its relevance to modern day management is widely debated in academic circles. In this essay, I will address the question of whether Scientific Management has a place today, in a 21st Century Knowledge Economy, or whether it belongs to a ââ¬Ëdifferent time and place. I will argue that much of modern management practice is derived from Taylorââ¬â¢s theories and that in this sense his work is very relevant. Next, I will examine the context in which Taylor developed his principles and contrast this with the contemporary context. Then I will evaluate the relevance of each of Taylorââ¬â¢s 4 Principles to today, with help from aâ⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦From this comes the argument that today we have moved into a knowledge economy and a new style of management must replace the now obsolete Scientific Management which was designed for standardized physical tasks. Gary Hamel terms this new st yle ââ¬ËManagement 2.0ââ¬â¢. Taylor developed SM to counteract phenomenon of soldiering which he encountered in the steel industry. The reasons for soldiering were as follows: ââ¬Å"1. The almost universally held belief among workers that if they became more productive, fewer of them would be needed and jobs would be eliminated. 2. Non-incentive wage systems encourage low productivity if the employee will receive the same pay regardless of how much is produced, assuming the employee can convince the employer that the slow pace really is a good pace for the job. Employees take great care never to work at a good pace for fear that this faster pace would become the new standard. If employees are paid by the quantity they produce, they fear that management will decrease their per-unit pay if the quantity increases. 3. Workers waste much of their effort by relying on rule-of-thumb methods rather than on optimal work methods that can be determined by scientific study of the task.â⬠(NetMBA, Business Knowledge Center) Soldiering is not a common practice in knowledge economies. The problem that Taylor developed his principles around are from aShow MoreRelatedCharacteristics of Scientific Management1674 Words à |à 7 PagesIntroduction Scientific management can be defined from a broad sense as the endeavors made in order to come up with suitable systems in the sector of industrial production and organization. In a narrower sense, it refers to the specific principles that were championed by Fredrick Taylor who was an engineer before the First World War. Taylor focused on ways of increasing productivity and reducing waste that resulted from management controlling the labor process. It is important to realize maximumRead MoreManagement Philosophy Comparison1706 Words à |à 7 PagesRunning head: MANAGEMENT PHILOSOPHY COMPARISON Management Philosophy Comparison Management philosophies MGT716 June 15, 2009 Management Philosophy Comparison Management aims to accomplish group purposes with the least expenditure of material or human resources (Koontz, 1969, p. 415). The term management philosophy seems almost oxymoronic in that they appear to work toward different results. The goal of management should be to improve the organization. (Kirkeby, 2000) suggestRead MoreDr. Frederick Winslow Taylor1319 Words à |à 6 Pages Dr. Frederick Winslow Taylor is best known for his scientific management principles where scientific methods are applied to management problems to increase productivity with less cost, time and effort .He is well known as the ââ¬ËFather of scientific managementââ¬â¢. But the term scientific management was not invented by Taylor. The origin of the term scientific management is identified to be in a book na- -med ââ¬ËThe Economy of Manufacturersââ¬â¢ written by Charles Babbage known as ââ¬ËFather of computerââ¬â¢Read MoreThe Theory Of Management Is Important Part Of Any Business Essay1326 Words à |à 6 Pages Management is arguably the most important part of any business or organisation. Without successful management any organisation will struggle to succeed in todayââ¬â¢s competitive business world. But what is the best approach for managers to take? How can employers use the idea of motivation within their management approach, to achieve a true competitive advantage? From the moment that the labour shortage hit the United States of America, during the industrial revolution, back in the early 1900s, theoristsRead MoreDiscuss How Management Theory and Practice Has Changed over Since the Early 1900ââ¬â¢s1408 Words à |à 6 Pagesevolution of management has been changed a lot since the early 1900ââ¬â¢s. Many different management theories have been developed, the external factor also changing at the same time, such as the technology and the nature of career. Those changing influence the trend of management method. There are four major approaches in the past, classical approaches, b ehavioral approaches, quantitative approaches and modern approaches. At the past, efficiency is the most important in the earliest management theories.Read MoreDescribe and Critique on Scientific Management1284 Words à |à 6 PagesReport Title: Describe and critique the Scientific Management approach pioneered by Frederick Taylor Content Page Executive Summary 2 Who Is Frederick W. Taylor? 3 Scientific Management 4 Fordism 5 Criticisms of Scientific Management 6 Neo - Taylorism 7 Conclusion 8 Reference List 9 Executive Summary This study aims to analyze and discuss both industrial benefits and social implications of Frederick Taylorââ¬â¢s scientific management approach. A brief biography of the ââ¬Å"FatherRead MoreManagement and Work Place1295 Words à |à 6 PagesWhat are the main features of Taylor s approach to Scientific management and what criticisms have been made of it? Do firms use scientific management today? Frederick Taylor was an American, born in 1856. He was an the early management consultants who shot to fame due to his book the Principles of Scientific management written in 1911. Taylor called it scientific management but later in time it became to be known as Taylorism recognising him as the father of this idea. The thoughtRead MoreTraditional Approaches For Job Design824 Words à |à 4 Pagesare many different approaches to job design including scientific management, job rotation/job enlargement, job enrichment, and job characteristics theory. Good job design assists in avoiding performance concerns, as well as improved productivity and enhances employee welfare. Each different approach to job design provides specific benefits to employees as well as the organization. The first approach is the scientific management approach. Scientific Management The scientific management approachRead MoreOrganizational Management Approach Analysis : Management And Bureaucratic Theory1421 Words à |à 6 PagesOrganizational Management Approach Analysis Managers today have many different options when choosing a managerial theory to implement for their organizations. Knowledgeable managers must be aware of the different historical approaches and also able to determine which approach would be most effective for their unit. The established work structure of my unit currently utilizes elements of classical organizational theory, more specifically scientific management and bureaucratic theory. More recentRead MoreTaylorism Is A Scientific Management System1480 Words à |à 6 PagesTaylorism is a scientific management system that was developed by Fredrick Taylor in the 1880s. Taylorism works in a method based on F. Taylorââ¬â¢s scientific study of accomplishing different tasks instead of empirical methods or methods inspired by past experience and knowledge. Taylorism also tends to scientifically train and help develop employeesââ¬â¢ skills instead of letting them train themselves during their time in the workplace. Another princi ple of Taylorism is that it gives comprehensive and
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.